Garrett (garote) wrote,
Garrett
garote

Dear "Sir".

Dear "Sir".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/14/AR2008011402083.html

Your article here has about as much integrity as a third-grade book report scrawled on a handkerchief during the bus ride to school.
I've seen better political commentary spill out of a scrabble box. This argument you present, basically attempting to link Senator Obama to Hitler via Jew-hatred, is what we on the internet call an invocation of Godwin's Law. Google it.

While an argument is typically defined as a series of connected statements designed to establish a proposition, the spew coming out of your word-processor does manage to paint a coherent argument despite missing the typical definition by a mile. The proposition is obviously "Richard Cohen is a vacuous pundit", and the connected statements are, "I, Richard Cohen, detect no outrage," "Therefore I shall attempt to manufacture it," "And I shall do so by trotting out dead news from ten months ago", and in conclusion, "I consider half a minute of Google too daunting for an editorial". Well proven, Sir! I am utterly convinced.

Of your disingenuous vapidity.

Good day.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 3 comments